- 78 Tarot Cards: Embark on a spooky journey with the Dark Horror Tarot. This spooky Tarot deck is full of dark, spooky and weird atmosphere, containing 78 cards, including all 22 Major Arcana cards, 40 Minor Arcana cards and 16 Court cards.
- Beginner Tarot Cards : Whether you’re an experienced tarot enthusiast, a fan of the macabre seeking to embrace the darkness, or an entrepreneur in search of bewitching offerings, this gothic horror tarot deck is a portal to an underworld of possibilities.
- Quality and Size of Tarot Cards: Made of high-quality 400 GSM paper, the cards are large in size (4.7*2.7 inches). These cards are not only durable, but also feel great and are a great visual treat. Whether for daily use or tarot readings, these cards can meet your needs.
- Tarot Cards With Guide Book For Beginners: Unleash your imagination and create your personalised tarot deck with ease using our versatile set. Each card exudes a gothic and mysterious aura, adding a layer of mystery to your divination and tarot readings, beckoning you to explore the shadows.
- Perfect for Gifting: Beautifully packaged, these cards make a thoughtful gift for anyone interested in spirituality, mindfulness, or personal growth. Whether it’s Thanksgiving, Christmas, Easter, Independence Day or Halloween, it’s the best for your friends.
Tarot Cards
78 Tarot Cards, Tarot Cards Deck with Guide Book for Beginners, Fortune Telling Toys, Durable Cards, Suitable for Beginners to Experts, Creative Art Real Experience.
$6.99
Disclosure| Product Dimensions | 4.7 x 2.7 x 0.4 inches |
|---|---|
| Item Weight | 10.8 ounces |
| Manufacturer recommended age | 17 years and up |
| Manufacturer | ZHQGYN |
27 reviews for 78 Tarot Cards, Tarot Cards Deck with Guide Book for Beginners, Fortune Telling Toys, Durable Cards, Suitable for Beginners to Experts, Creative Art Real Experience.
Related products
- Tarot Cards
Star Trek: The Next Generation Tarot Deck and Guidebook
Original price was: $18.00.$16.99Current price is: $16.99. Shop Now
pierra –
This deck is absolutely beautiful. i am glad i came across it and purchased it.
Intuitive Rose –
I love this oracle deck, great advice, good artistry and excellent price
TPP –
I love this deck! I use it often! It is great quality and I like that it includes the zodiac signs in the deck!
Jess –
The Love Oracle deck is one that I’ve seen around on the internet for a while now, so I decided to give it a try by purchasing these for myself. The cards are standard Tarot-card size, and are very high quality. They are very easy to read, and easy to use as well. These cards in specific are great for very simple readings, or readings that are straightforward and straight to the point. Not to mention, they are colorful and nice to look at. Thank you so much.
Iseeyou1837542 –
The illustrated (probably AI) art on the front of the cards was mostly okay, if not always in line with RWS meanings (like why does the Chariot card look like the Death card and the Fool look like it should be the Two of Wands). HOWEVER I found the wrong title of the deck, printed on the backs of ALL the cards in heavy, large white font (see the picture) VERY a solid deal breaker and I had to return the deck. Also, the small LWB included was not helpful (it seemed like it was also AI generated) or very detailed, so this is NOT a very user-friendly. All around a very big disappointment for me and not recommended.
Inksweat –
Easy to use, good quality, easy to shuffle
distilledknight –
My favorite oracle deck. Yes there are grammar mistakes but the messages are very clear.
Inksweat –
The artwork is dark and mostly interesting–and for a pip deck the minor arcana are pretty and on theme… but it’s still a pip deck, which is enough for me to be uninterested in it.
The other problem is that the imagery of the major arcana is at best, if one is generous, vaguely Rider-Waite adjacent. This isn’t to say that being a Rider-Waite variant is a bad thing, but that this is a bad adaptation because the symbolism is so thin on the ground, if you aren’t already acquainted with an interpretive discipline, these cards aren’t going to help you become acquainted. Unless you’re at the level where something like the Synesthesia Tarot, or other minimalism designs are in your wheelhouse, if you aren’t at the level where you could do a reading by drawing card names out of a hat, this deck is all kinds of opaque if not downright wrong or misleading, especially when you factor in that the booklet *is* Rider-Waite interpretations.
And, as will be a problem with tarot decks, for the foreseeable future (sic), I have a strong suspicion this is an AI art deck. It’s well curated, the style is consistent, and for the most part the hands are fine, but there are places where the details look more like AI confusion than artist trying to get done after the fun parts are finished–and a couple where the bad hands look more like AI slop than artist discretion or failings–but most of them have the right number of fingers. Most of them.
A final failing is one that is surprisingly common with modern tarot design: the backs are far from symmetric. It is *very* obvious if a card will be reversed or not. This isn’t a problem if you don’t read reversals, but if you do, it loses an “X” factor and introduces a potential for aversion as it signals how to flip a card to avoid exposing a reversal. It doesn’t take much discipline to always flip a card in the exact same way, but for me, it adds the wrong kind of tension to the process if I am choosing not to have a reversal. I prefer and recommend using cards with symmetric backs that allow you to flip the cards more organically without the thought “this is a reversal” before flipping it. Even just the knowledge that the next card is going to be reversed can influence how you perceive other cards in anticipation of the reversal coming up, which I personally find disruptive to reacting to present tableau.
Granted, one can also avoid this by revealing all the cards before doing any interpretation at all, and there are times I do that too–but sometimes you want the drama of interpreting as you go, and a card back that reveals that much interferes with creating that atmosphere.
But other than the aforementioned subjectively damning aesthetic flaws, the cards seem to be reasonably well made, the storage box is sufficiently compact to keep and use for storage, at $10 it’s a very affordable deck for a proficient reader to use as a bang-a-round, and I like that the art is borderless.
Intuitive Rose –
The artwork is dark and mostly interesting–and for a pip deck the minor arcana are pretty and on theme… but it’s still a pip deck, which is enough for me to be uninterested in it.
The other problem is that the imagery of the major arcana is at best, if one is generous, vaguely Rider-Waite adjacent. This isn’t to say that being a Rider-Waite variant is a bad thing, but that this is a bad adaptation because the symbolism is so thin on the ground, if you aren’t already acquainted with an interpretive discipline, these cards aren’t going to help you become acquainted. Unless you’re at the level where something like the Synesthesia Tarot, or other minimalism designs are in your wheelhouse, if you aren’t at the level where you could do a reading by drawing card names out of a hat, this deck is all kinds of opaque if not downright wrong or misleading, especially when you factor in that the booklet *is* Rider-Waite interpretations.
And, as will be a problem with tarot decks, for the foreseeable future (sic), I have a strong suspicion this is an AI art deck. It’s well curated, the style is consistent, and for the most part the hands are fine, but there are places where the details look more like AI confusion than artist trying to get done after the fun parts are finished–and a couple where the bad hands look more like AI slop than artist discretion or failings–but most of them have the right number of fingers. Most of them.
A final failing is one that is surprisingly common with modern tarot design: the backs are far from symmetric. It is *very* obvious if a card will be reversed or not. This isn’t a problem if you don’t read reversals, but if you do, it loses an “X” factor and introduces a potential for aversion as it signals how to flip a card to avoid exposing a reversal. It doesn’t take much discipline to always flip a card in the exact same way, but for me, it adds the wrong kind of tension to the process if I am choosing not to have a reversal. I prefer and recommend using cards with symmetric backs that allow you to flip the cards more organically without the thought “this is a reversal” before flipping it. Even just the knowledge that the next card is going to be reversed can influence how you perceive other cards in anticipation of the reversal coming up, which I personally find disruptive to reacting to present tableau.
Granted, one can also avoid this by revealing all the cards before doing any interpretation at all, and there are times I do that too–but sometimes you want the drama of interpreting as you go, and a card back that reveals that much interferes with creating that atmosphere.
But other than the aforementioned subjectively damning aesthetic flaws, the cards seem to be reasonably well made, the storage box is sufficiently compact to keep and use for storage, at $10 it’s a very affordable deck for a proficient reader to use as a bang-a-round, and I like that the art is borderless.
distilledknight –
The cards come in a solid high quality box (which can be used for storage) and the art throughout is solid and sticks to a constant theme. However, the numbering system is badly in error: there are two 1s, two 11s, no 14 and either the name on the back of the cards (“Neo-Punk Arcana”) or the box (“Gothic-Horror Style”) is also incorrect. The cards themselves appear to be made from high quality stock, but the errors are impossible to overlook.
Frank Schiavo –
This deck screams Halloween charm! The artwork reminds me of stop-motion fantasy—adorable with a shadowy twist. Not ideal for learning due to minimal guidance and pip card simplicity, but as a longtime reader, I love the aesthetic. Great cardstock and a strong box make it feel like a collectible. Definitely staying in my rotation.
distilledknight –
These are some PDF print off with no book or helpful guide at all. The images are cool, but the chunky text on the back of the cards is tacky and off putting. I suppose I can use them for art.
CR –
These are some PDF print off with no book or helpful guide at all. The images are cool, but the chunky text on the back of the cards is tacky and off putting. I suppose I can use them for art.
distilledknight –
This deck is basically useless for tarot readings because the art on the back is facing one direction rather than a mirrored image design, so you’d know before you pull whether your card was normal or reversed. I’m really disappointed; I bought this deck because the art was amazing, but I can’t use it.
Alexis –
This deck is basically useless for tarot readings because the art on the back is facing one direction rather than a mirrored image design, so you’d know before you pull whether your card was normal or reversed. I’m really disappointed; I bought this deck because the art was amazing, but I can’t use it.
Brandan –
This deck is absolutely beautiful. i am glad i came across it and purchased it.
pierra –
The cards come in a solid high quality box (which can be used for storage) and the art throughout is solid and sticks to a constant theme. However, the numbering system is badly in error: there are two 1s, two 11s, no 14 and either the name on the back of the cards (“Neo-Punk Arcana”) or the box (“Gothic-Horror Style”) is also incorrect. The cards themselves appear to be made from high quality stock, but the errors are impossible to overlook.
Inksweat –
There is a reason this deck is so cheap. The artistic designs are problematic.
The backs are not top/bottom mirrored, so you can’t really pull reverses without knowing it in advance. The face of the cards don’t necessarily look AI (though they could be), but they just don’t capture the vibe of Tarot. They look more like random reference sheet characters. The wands all have crosses that look like hilts so it’s hard to tell at a glance if you have a wand or a sword. The chariot is a guy on horseback… It’s just… bad.
I glossed over the guidebook. It was just ok. At first I thought they left out the Page, Knight, Queen, and King cards, but the page order was a little weird, First all the major arcana, then all the face cards of the minor arcana, then the Ace through X of the minor arcana. At a glance, the interpretations seemed pretty standard. If the booklet wasn’t included, you wouldn’t miss it.
In summation, the actual physical cards and box are top quality. It’s a shame the art was so weak.
Brandan –
I dont love that they say tarot card on the back so you can see which ones are in reverse
Captainkillbot –
This deck is absolutely beautiful. i am glad i came across it and purchased it.
CR –
There is a reason this deck is so cheap. The artistic designs are problematic.
The backs are not top/bottom mirrored, so you can’t really pull reverses without knowing it in advance. The face of the cards don’t necessarily look AI (though they could be), but they just don’t capture the vibe of Tarot. They look more like random reference sheet characters. The wands all have crosses that look like hilts so it’s hard to tell at a glance if you have a wand or a sword. The chariot is a guy on horseback… It’s just… bad.
I glossed over the guidebook. It was just ok. At first I thought they left out the Page, Knight, Queen, and King cards, but the page order was a little weird, First all the major arcana, then all the face cards of the minor arcana, then the Ace through X of the minor arcana. At a glance, the interpretations seemed pretty standard. If the booklet wasn’t included, you wouldn’t miss it.
In summation, the actual physical cards and box are top quality. It’s a shame the art was so weak.
distilledknight –
The artwork is dark and mostly interesting–and for a pip deck the minor arcana are pretty and on theme… but it’s still a pip deck, which is enough for me to be uninterested in it.
The other problem is that the imagery of the major arcana is at best, if one is generous, vaguely Rider-Waite adjacent. This isn’t to say that being a Rider-Waite variant is a bad thing, but that this is a bad adaptation because the symbolism is so thin on the ground, if you aren’t already acquainted with an interpretive discipline, these cards aren’t going to help you become acquainted. Unless you’re at the level where something like the Synesthesia Tarot, or other minimalism designs are in your wheelhouse, if you aren’t at the level where you could do a reading by drawing card names out of a hat, this deck is all kinds of opaque if not downright wrong or misleading, especially when you factor in that the booklet *is* Rider-Waite interpretations.
And, as will be a problem with tarot decks, for the foreseeable future (sic), I have a strong suspicion this is an AI art deck. It’s well curated, the style is consistent, and for the most part the hands are fine, but there are places where the details look more like AI confusion than artist trying to get done after the fun parts are finished–and a couple where the bad hands look more like AI slop than artist discretion or failings–but most of them have the right number of fingers. Most of them.
A final failing is one that is surprisingly common with modern tarot design: the backs are far from symmetric. It is *very* obvious if a card will be reversed or not. This isn’t a problem if you don’t read reversals, but if you do, it loses an “X” factor and introduces a potential for aversion as it signals how to flip a card to avoid exposing a reversal. It doesn’t take much discipline to always flip a card in the exact same way, but for me, it adds the wrong kind of tension to the process if I am choosing not to have a reversal. I prefer and recommend using cards with symmetric backs that allow you to flip the cards more organically without the thought “this is a reversal” before flipping it. Even just the knowledge that the next card is going to be reversed can influence how you perceive other cards in anticipation of the reversal coming up, which I personally find disruptive to reacting to present tableau.
Granted, one can also avoid this by revealing all the cards before doing any interpretation at all, and there are times I do that too–but sometimes you want the drama of interpreting as you go, and a card back that reveals that much interferes with creating that atmosphere.
But other than the aforementioned subjectively damning aesthetic flaws, the cards seem to be reasonably well made, the storage box is sufficiently compact to keep and use for storage, at $10 it’s a very affordable deck for a proficient reader to use as a bang-a-round, and I like that the art is borderless.
CR –
Super cute I gave them to my friend and she really enjoyed it.
CR –
The illustrated (probably AI) art on the front of the cards was mostly okay, if not always in line with RWS meanings (like why does the Chariot card look like the Death card and the Fool look like it should be the Two of Wands). HOWEVER I found the wrong title of the deck, printed on the backs of ALL the cards in heavy, large white font (see the picture) VERY a solid deal breaker and I had to return the deck. Also, the small LWB included was not helpful (it seemed like it was also AI generated) or very detailed, so this is NOT a very user-friendly. All around a very big disappointment for me and not recommended.
f2x –
The artwork is dark and mostly interesting–and for a pip deck the minor arcana are pretty and on theme… but it’s still a pip deck, which is enough for me to be uninterested in it.
The other problem is that the imagery of the major arcana is at best, if one is generous, vaguely Rider-Waite adjacent. This isn’t to say that being a Rider-Waite variant is a bad thing, but that this is a bad adaptation because the symbolism is so thin on the ground, if you aren’t already acquainted with an interpretive discipline, these cards aren’t going to help you become acquainted. Unless you’re at the level where something like the Synesthesia Tarot, or other minimalism designs are in your wheelhouse, if you aren’t at the level where you could do a reading by drawing card names out of a hat, this deck is all kinds of opaque if not downright wrong or misleading, especially when you factor in that the booklet *is* Rider-Waite interpretations.
And, as will be a problem with tarot decks, for the foreseeable future (sic), I have a strong suspicion this is an AI art deck. It’s well curated, the style is consistent, and for the most part the hands are fine, but there are places where the details look more like AI confusion than artist trying to get done after the fun parts are finished–and a couple where the bad hands look more like AI slop than artist discretion or failings–but most of them have the right number of fingers. Most of them.
A final failing is one that is surprisingly common with modern tarot design: the backs are far from symmetric. It is *very* obvious if a card will be reversed or not. This isn’t a problem if you don’t read reversals, but if you do, it loses an “X” factor and introduces a potential for aversion as it signals how to flip a card to avoid exposing a reversal. It doesn’t take much discipline to always flip a card in the exact same way, but for me, it adds the wrong kind of tension to the process if I am choosing not to have a reversal. I prefer and recommend using cards with symmetric backs that allow you to flip the cards more organically without the thought “this is a reversal” before flipping it. Even just the knowledge that the next card is going to be reversed can influence how you perceive other cards in anticipation of the reversal coming up, which I personally find disruptive to reacting to present tableau.
Granted, one can also avoid this by revealing all the cards before doing any interpretation at all, and there are times I do that too–but sometimes you want the drama of interpreting as you go, and a card back that reveals that much interferes with creating that atmosphere.
But other than the aforementioned subjectively damning aesthetic flaws, the cards seem to be reasonably well made, the storage box is sufficiently compact to keep and use for storage, at $10 it’s a very affordable deck for a proficient reader to use as a bang-a-round, and I like that the art is borderless.
Brandan –
This deck is as it appears in pictures. The quality is great, the artwork is beautiful and overall an awesome product. Thank you.
NATTY –
They’re beautiful and well done, very personal and accurate. Perfect for the price and easy guide book that explains everything!